Saturday, 15 September 2012

Malaysia Cup: Is Singapore Football Pathetic Or Not?

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Update as on 19 Sep 2012 (Wed):
FA$ President Zainudin Nordin claims he is "very sorry" about this incident. But he will not be doing anything to appease fans such as offering FREE entry to the next Malaysia Cup match or refunding all bets placed with Singapore Pools on the match results. A check with Singapore Pools actually reveals that bets WILL be refunded if matches are abandoned.
FA$ President says sorry nia, sees no need to take any action
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

After the match in which the LionsXII drew 0-0 with Johor FC on 14 Sep 2012 (Fri), kiasu coach Sundram was quoted in the press as saying:
“After 60 minutes, the attack died down because the players were tired. They have had too many back to back games.”

It seems that the coach discovered that after 60 minutes, his players were simply too tired or maybe had been smoking too much, so they stopped playing football and just passed the ball to one another without attacking. Eventually it resulted in a draw. But the last time I heard, football is actually a game played over 90 minutes, not 60 minutes.

Surprisingly, key defender Baihakki Khaizan spilled the beans on Friday night by saying the players were "just following orders", ie. they could still play football if they wanted to:


Also the Football Association of Singapore (FAS) has yet to apologize for the unsporting behaviour of its team of professional players. The FAS president Zainudin Nordin, also a Member of Parliament, was even quoted as saying "The less that is spoken of the match, the better". I wonder what our sports-related minister Teo Ser Luck thinks about this incident. He attended the London Olympics recently, so he should know something about fair play or sports ethics, right? Maybe he needs to check with Zainudin Nordin if he really uttered such a statement or are his words being "taken out of context"?!

 
(By the way, I still don't understand why politicians are tasked to head sports associations? Eg. Lee Bee Wah (table tennis), Lee Yi Shyan (badminton), etc. Shouldn't they spend more time interacting with their residents and let people with sports/community background lead the associations instead?)

I really can't imagine this is the pathetic state of Singapore football, after more than 10 years of a so-called professional football league. Jialat liao... Think got no cure.

Tell me if you think FAS should apologize.

[For coach's quote & background information, see below:]
http://www.goal.com/en-sg/news/3879/malaysia-cup/2012/09/15/3377365/lionsxii-coach-sundrams-message-to-the-fans-the-boys-will-be

Lastly, some well-meaning comments from a few cow-peh cow-bu fans:
The essence of sportsmanship which every father, mother or coach had ever imparted to his children and charges have all been thrown down the waterway.

If Johor chose not to play, there is no reason why Sundram's boys should follow into the Devil's Horn.


I am really ashamed to hear the infuriated fan hurling his contempt and major disappointment in his interview after the game.


It is only right if Sundram comes out and apologise. He can say he did his job to make the team progress into the QF, but his naivety in instructions is only a short term solution and not a long term one for success.


In this process, many many fans were hurt and may choose not to ever return to the next game. He does not see the consequences and in the interest of the Legacy of the Malaysia Cup, as well as football, he chose to undermine it's principle foundation of providing entertainment, and inflicted pain to all the overbearing supporters not just in the stadium but at home.


Less than a month after PM Lee Hsien Loong heaped praise on the dedication and hard work of striker Sufian and FAS during the National Day Rally, now all his words of encouragement would have been better not said as it really is an insult to PM.


I hope FAM punish FAS and Johor FC and expel them and allow Johor FA and PKNS to enter instead. Infact, if there is proof the match had already been pre-arranged with a pre-determined result, CPIB should come in and investigate everyone.


If Sundram can say the players are tired, then professionalism is still very much lacking in everyone. Wouldn't it be better to tell the fans not to come and save their money?

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If there is no legalized betting on this game, then I have nothing to say except that they still played by the rules, though I would have preferred the referee to be proactive by issuing players warnings or yellow cards for time-wasting play.

What both teams did is called match-fixing. Very surprised the Lions coach has such a thick skin by requesting $8-paying fans to support them in next match.
FAS and the Police should investigate if any player or Sundram the coach made substantial bets by getting friends or relatives to buy on their behalf. Fans should be refunded as well.

A very sad day for Singapore football. No pride after more than 10 years of PROFESSIONAL football.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wtf, i'm so ashamed by the LionsXII's 2nd half performance.. The good news is u guys are through to the next round but the bad news is, i've lost my respect for the team.. Seriously, i'd rather we lose the match than to advance in this manner..!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------


Sunday, 9 September 2012

Remaking Singapore again?! No problem, listen only mah.


My friend who is married to the Internet said his wife told him that one Hammer Party MP recently got hammered by some netizens on that IPO-price-$38-got-hammered-to-$18-company website. I thought that should be quite interesting stuff so I went to take a look.

Basically that MP guy, who married a beautiful Singaporean performing artist whom I heard is quite famous in India by the way, claims that the Government is not willing to change whatever shit it is doing and the National Conversation which is happening now is just some wayang show to let people know they are looking into some issues... Yes, just looking into.... Then he said we already got this stuff before, such as the Remaking Singapore Wayang Show in 2002.

Hmmm.... Sounds interesting to me.... So even though I am damn busy with my business plus chasing chiobus all over Singapore, I decided to find out more about Remaking Singapore 2002 report as I know there is a super kwailan website which likes to hammer the Hammer Party. So if I find out that the Government actually improved and made some changes from that report, then I can provide ammo for that psycho website to hammer that party jialat jialat.

Luckily I got the Remaking Singapore report below just by typing a few words into a search engine:
http://was.nl.sg/wayback/20070115030104/http://www.remakingsingapore.gov.sg/Full%20Version%20of%20Remake%20Sg.pdf 

Alamak! The report is damn long, more than 100 pages! Guess have to be long-winded, since it claims it sought opinions from more than 10,000 Singaporeans leh. So I just browsed but still managed to pick up some interesting stuff....

Page 30: Talking about foreigners and new citizens...... Hmmm....Very interesting stuff as that was in 2002, when foreigners were still quite manageable in terms of numbers and yet to overload the nation’s basic infrastructure and transport systems! It says Singaporeans are concerned in 2 areas - economic insecurity due to their presence and adverse impact on our nascent (to ah bengs/ah lians: this angmoh word means beginning or newly formed) national identity! Then this fantastic statement appears: Singaporeans’ worries are not necessarily due to a failure to understand rational arguments and reasons, but could stem from more visceral causes.

(Visceral means characterized by or proceeding from instinct rather than intellect: eg.a visceral reaction)

This is actually a very good observation or feedback which I suppose the committee agreed without a doubt! So we Singaporeans are rational and reasonable people, maybe just worried due to survival instincts. But the sad thing is, 10 years later, PM Lee starts to use the expression “one-eyed dragon” on those who seem to be too disturbed by foreigners. I really wonder what were the expressions on Vivian Balakrishnan’s and Khaw Boon Wan’s faces when they heard PM Lee uttered this?! These were the 2 leaders in charge of the Remaking Singapore committee who thought Singaporeans were rational and reasonable!

Even if the truth is as stated by PM Lee, we should investigate what could have transformed rational and reasonable beings into dragons in 10 years' time right? The cause (be it immigration policy or you-die-your-business attitude or whatever) might turn out to be something more terrible than dragons.

[Side track to PM Lee: My friend laughed like siao when PM Lee said don’t be a one-eyed dragon on TV. I asked him why and he said what a funny nickname PM Lee gave to himself. Oh, then I realised his last Chinese character means dragon... LOL....]

Page 35: Talking about early childhood and pre-school education issues. That time PM Goh Chok Tong didn’t think that area was important, so kena rejected. But now, 10 years later, PM Lee thinks it is important liao and is setting up a pre-school statutory board to look into the various concerns raised then:

Wow, it took 10 years for feedback to be finally accepted by the Government but at least PAP government is starting to be really good friends with young parents now... Good start, right? Though I wonder what suggestions will be accepted in another 10 years time....

Page ? (Sorry I forgot liao. Please tell me if you have time to search): Talks about newspaper simi lanjiao printing act and that the Government should allow more competition and accept private players into the market. But the proposal was kena rejected because the PAP kaki-lang (own people) committee thought otherwise.

Page ? (Sorry I forgot liao. Please tell me if you have time to search): Talks about re-drawing of electoral boundaries and why this practice should end! Wow, this one is a very bold suggestion put up by dunno which goondus. As usual of elitist I-scratch-your-backside-you-scratch-my-backside thinking, the committee wrote that the election rules were not as important as voting a prudent party to be in government. Hmmm....Sounds logical right?

My general feel after a quick browsing of the 2002 report seems to be that it is reflective of the will of most Singaporeans not only then, but in 2012 too. But my personal view is that the Hammer MP is correct to point out that nothing major has changed till now, although most civil servants now work 5-day weeks and no Primary 3 streaming leh... as well as emergence of 2 casinos and more vice-related activities/crimes. But I still hope someone from that highly secretive PAP Internet Brigade (which I heard is headed by a Gen. Baey Yam Keng) can educate me on how much Singapore has improved though.

Ok I have written enough.... Please read the entire report yourself if you are really keen to take part in the National Conversation 2012 as you can just ask the government how come this or that suggestion is not yet implemented. I believe 90% or all that can be said to the government in 2012 can also be found in 2002.

Lastly, feel free to comment if you have any ammo for me to send to that psycho website to hammer the Hammer Party. :P